SELL GEBE TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER

Table of Contents

Powering Through Corruption: Can Privatization Illuminate St. Maarten’s Future?

For decades, St. Maarten’s energy sector has been a festering wound of mismanagement, corruption, and gross incompetence. At the heart of this disaster lies GEBE, the utility company whose catastrophic failures have plunged the island into darkness – both literally and metaphorically.

The roots of this crisis run deep, intertwining government, business, and a culture of nepotism that has strangled any semblance of accountability. The government’s concession agreement with GEBE, meant to ensure reliable power for the island, has instead become a farce. Conflicts of interest have rendered oversight non-existent, allowing GEBE to operate with impunity.

Years of poor governance, blatant corruption, and sheer ineptitude have culminated in the current crisis. The island’s critical thinking capacity has been eroded by entrenched systems of patronage and favoritism. Even more galling, we witness the spectacle of a former minister responsible for GEBE criticizing the very institution he failed to reform during his four-year tenure. This cycle of blame-shifting and incompetence has gone on for decades, each administration perpetuating the rot.

Recent challenges – a malfunctioning “relatively new” production unit, reduced power demand during COVID-19, and the devastation of Hurricane Irma in 2017 – have merely exposed the rot that was always there. GEBE now teeters on the brink of technical bankruptcy, a situation that should have been unthinkable for a vital utility.

The government’s historic over-extraction of funds from GEBE, far beyond what the concession agreement allowed, further complicates matters. This pillaging, facilitated by a parade of directors installed through nepotism, went unchallenged. In a just world, both GEBE and the government would face bankruptcy proceedings, with GEBE reclaiming its stolen funds.

It’s clear that the St. Maarten government is utterly incapable of managing this crisis or reforming the energy sector. The time has come for drastic action (our thought): the privatization of St. Maarten’s energy market.

The government in our opinion must:

  1. Immediately revoke GEBE’s concession.
  2. Open the energy market to international bidders with proven track records.
  3. Establish an independent regulatory body to oversee the transition and future operations.
  4. Implement strict anti-corruption measures and transparency requirements for any new operator.
  5. Ensure that any privatization deal includes commitments to infrastructure upgrades and stable pricing.

Privatization is not without risks, but the status quo is untenable. St. Maarten desperately needs an energy provider driven by expertise and market forces, not political whims and family connections. The island’s economy, safety, and future depend on reliable power. It’s time to pull the plug on GEBE’s monopoly and usher in a new era of energy stability for St. Maarten.

Advantages of Privatization in St. Maarten’s Corrupt Climate

  1. Disruption of nepotism networks:
    International companies are likely to bring their own personnel, reducing the influence of local corrupt networks.
  2. Increased transparency:
    Publicly traded companies must comply with strict reporting requirements, making corruption more difficult.
  3. Performance-based management:
    Private companies are more likely to appoint managers based on merit rather than connections.
  4. Financial independence:
    Less reliance on government funding limits opportunities for political interference.
  5. International oversight:
    Foreign investors and regulators can add extra layers of control.
  6. Competitive pressure:
    If multiple companies are allowed, competition ensures better service and less room for corruption.
  7. Technological innovation:
    Private companies often have more resources for innovation, making systems less manipulable.
  8. Professionalization:
    International standards can improve local practices and discourage corruption.
  9. Economic stimulus:
    More efficient energy provision can stimulate economic growth, potentially leading to more opportunities and less dependence on corrupt systems.
  10. Legal consequences:
    International companies risk severe penalties for corruption, which serves as a strong deterrent.
  11. Expertise influx:
    Bringing in international experts can introduce best practices and challenge entrenched corrupt behaviors.
  12. Depoliticization of utilities:
    Removing direct government control can reduce political manipulation of essential services.
  13. Improved accountability:
    Shareholders and international regulators demand higher levels of accountability than local political structures.
  14. Economic diversification:
    Opening the market can attract new industries and reduce reliance on traditional, corruption-prone sectors.
  15. Cultural shift:
    Exposure to international business practices can gradually influence local business culture towards more ethical standards.

While privatization is not a panacea, it can be a crucial first step in breaking the current cycle of corruption and mismanagement in St. Maarten. It introduces new actors and structures that are less susceptible to existing corrupt practices, thus creating opportunities for real change in the energy sector and potentially beyond. The key lies in careful implementation, robust regulatory frameworks, and ongoing vigilance to ensure that privatization truly serves the public interest rather than simply shifting the beneficiaries of corruption.

Possible drawbacks of Privatization in Sint Maarten

  1. Political resistance: Local politicians and stakeholders benefiting from the current system will likely fiercely oppose changes, potentially delaying or sabotaging the process.
  2. Price increases: A private company will likely raise tariffs to recoup investments, which could be problematic for poorer households.
  3. Layoffs and social unrest: Mass layoffs at GEBE could lead to protests and social tensions on the small island.
  4. Loss of political favors: Politicians lose a key source of jobs and favors, potentially undermining their power base.
  5. Complex transition period: The transition may lead to temporary service disruptions, damaging public trust.
  6. Lack of local expertise: There may be insufficient local talent to fill key positions, leading to dependence on foreign personnel.
  7. Cultural friction: Foreign management styles may clash with the local work culture, causing internal tensions.
  8. Limited competition: Given St. Maarten’s small market, true competition might not be feasible, potentially leading to a private monopoly.
  9. Legal challenges: Complex ownership issues and contracts could result in prolonged lawsuits.
  10. Reduced flexibility in disasters: A private company may be less inclined to incur costs for emergency provisions during hurricanes.
  11. Lobbying influence: Large energy companies could gain disproportionate influence on local policy through lobbying.
  12. Loss of local knowledge: Years of experience with St. Maarten’s specific challenges could be lost in a complete takeover.
  13. Currency risks: Dependence on foreign investments could make the local economy vulnerable to exchange rate fluctuations.
  14. Limited transparency: Commercial confidentiality may lead to less openness about decision-making than with a public utility.

These drawbacks illustrate that privatization, while potentially beneficial, comes with significant challenges and risks that need to be carefully considered and managed in the context of St. Maarten’s unique situation.

The path forward will be challenging, but it offers hope – something in short supply under the current failed system. St. Maarten’s people deserve an end to this perpetual crisis. It’s time to brighten the island’s future by embracing a truly open and competitive energy market.